Gisella’s research explores how ethical ideas can be translated into effective institutional form. Working at the intersection of law, governance, and systems thinking, she is interested in how public institutions can become more coherent, adaptive, and ethically serious in the face of complex social and environmental challenges.
At the Schweitzer Institute, her work sits within a wider intellectual project concerned with ecological values, human responsibility, and the practical implications of cross-disciplinary scholarship.
Within that setting, her research focuses especially on institutional design: how states organise responsibility, how ethical concerns are weakened within fragmented systems, and how governance frameworks can be reshaped to produce more accountable and humane outcomes.

A major strand of Gisella’s recent work concerns the structural failures of animal welfare governance in the United Kingdom. In collaboration with the Centre for Animals and Social Justice (CASJ), she has helped develop proposals for a Governmental Animal Protection Commission, examining how animal welfare might be given stronger oversight, better coordination, and greater institutional weight across government.
In April 2026, she presented her draft APC position paper at a Westminster conference hosted by the Schweitzer Institute and the CASJ, setting out the case for a more coherent and effective framework for animal protection policy. This work is concerned not only with legal reform, but with deeper questions of public administration: how responsibilities are distributed, how systems fail, and what kinds of institutions are needed to secure meaningful ethical accountability.

Gisella’s research also engages broader questions of symmetry, resilience, and public ethics. At the Royal Society symposium Edge of Chaos: Exploring Dynamic Symmetry Theory in May 2026, she presented a paper on governance, infrastructure, and ethics, exploring how systems function best between rigidity and disorder, and how those insights might inform the design of governmental policy frameworks. (See video below.)
This line of inquiry reflects a wider interest in the relationship between theoretical models and practical institutions. It asks how ideas drawn from complexity and symmetry can help explain why some systems become brittle or chaotic, while others achieve balance, adaptability, and durability.

Alongside her own research, Gisella co-edits The Schweitzer Institute Journal and OXQ: The Oxford Quarterly Journal of Symmetry & Asymmetry. Through this editorial work, she helps shape scholarship across environmental ethics, science, sustainability, and emerging interdisciplinary debates.
Her broader aim is to make complex ideas intellectually rigorous, publicly accessible, and institutionally relevant. Later in 2026, she will continue this work at Balliol College, Oxford, where she will co-host a conference and speak on governance, infrastructure, and ethics.
From the ‘Edge of Chaos’ conference at the Royal Society, London on 15 May 2026:
‘Dynamic Symmetry and the Design of More Adaptive and Effective Public Institutions’